Exercises from Section 1.2.7
Tord M. Johnson
April 27, 2015
1. [01] What are ,
, and
?
By definition, we have
|
and
|
2. [13] Show that the simple argument used in the text to prove that
can be slightly modified
to prove that .
We can show that the simple argument used in the text to prove that
may be slightly modified to prove that ,
by noting that for each term, ,
as shown in the proof by induction below.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let be an arbitrary
integer such that .
We must show that .
In the case that ,
Then, assuming
we must show that
But
as we needed to show. □
3. [M21] Generalize the argument used in the previous exercise to show that, for
, the sum
remains bounded
for all .
Find an upper bound.
Proposition.
for .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and
an arbitrary
real such that .
We must show that
First note that for arbitrary ,
we may show that
|
If ,
Then assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
and hence the noted inequality. We now continue with the main proof.
Since , we have both
in the case that
that
|
and in the case that
for
that
|
Then, for arbitrary ,
and since ,
as we needed to show. □
4. [10] Decide which of the following statements are true for all positive integers
: (a)
. (b)
. (c)
.
In summary, (a) is false, while (b) and (c) are true, the justification for each enumerated
below.
-
a)
-
is not true for all positive integers ,
as may be seen by considering ,
in which case, .
-
b)
-
is true for all positive integers ,
as may be deduced from Eq. (3), since .
-
c)
-
is true for all positive integers ,
as may also be deduced from Eq. (3), since .
5. [15] Give the value of
to 15 decimal places, using the tables in Appendix A.
From Eq. (3) we know
for .
Letting ,
since
we may ignore in
order to approximate
to only 15 decimal places as
Given
we may compute the sum as
| 2.30258 50929 94045 6 |
| 2.30258 50929 94045 6 |
| 2.30258 50929 94045 6 |
| 2.30258 50929 94045 6 |
| 0.57721 56649 01532 8 |
| 0.00004 99991 66666 6 |
|
|
| 9.78760 60360 44381 8 |
|
That is,
|
6. [M15] Prove that the harmonic numbers are directly related to Stirling’s numbers, which were introduced in the
previous section; in fact,
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that
In the case that ,
Then, assuming
we must show that
But
as we needed to show. □
7. [M21] Let . (a)
Show that when
or increases,
never increases
(assuming that and
are positive). (b) Compute the
minimum and maximum values of
for .
We may provide a proof and determine bounds.
-
a)
- We may show that
never increases.
Proposition.
for
positive integers.
Proof. Define
as
and let
and
be arbitrary positive integers. We must show that
But
as we needed to show. □
-
b)
- We may determine both the lower and upper bounds of
, for
positive
integers. Since
never increases, we know that the lower bound corresponds to the limit as
,
and from Eq. (3),
|
Similarly, since
never increases, we know that the upper bound corresponds to
,
and
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[AMM 70 (1963), 575–577]
8. [HM18] Compare Eq. (8) with ; estimate
the difference as a function of .
Given Eq. (8)
|
we may estimate the difference with .
First, we note from Eq. (3) that
Second, we note from Stirling’s approximation that
And so,
9. [M18] Theorem A applies
only when ; what is the value of
the sum considered when ?
We make a proposition and offer proof in the case that .
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary positive integer. We must show that
|
If ,
|
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
10. [M20] (Summation by parts.) We have used special cases of the general method of summation by parts in
exercise 1.2.4-42 and in the derivation of Eq. (9). Prove the general formula
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary positive integer. We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
11.
[M21] Using summation by parts, evaluate
The sum may be evaluated using summation by parts as
12. [M10]
Evaluate
correct to at least 100 decimal places.
By definition
|
where
from exercise 3, and
so that
|
to at least 100 decimal places.
13. [M22] Prove the identity
|
(Note in particular the special case ,
which gives us an identity related to exercise 1.2.6-48.)
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary positive integer and
an arbitrary real. We must show that
|
In the case that
|
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
14. [M22] Show that ,
and evaluate .
We may prove the identity.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
Thus, we may evaluate the sum as
15. [M23]
Express in
terms of and
.
The sum is
16. [18] Express the sum
in terms of harmonic numbers.
The sum of all unit fractions
with odd denominators through
may be expressed as
17. [M24] (E. Waring, 1782.) Let be an
odd prime. Show that the numerator of
is divisible by .
Proposition. If
is an odd prime, the numerator of
is divisible by .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary odd prime. We must show that the numerator of
is divisible
by .
That is, that
|
From exercise 1.2.4-19, the law of inverses, we may find a
such that
|
since . Note that
and that each
is unique such that
. Also note that
since is an odd
prime by hypothesis,
is an integer. Then, from Wilson’s theorem
|
we have that
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[Hardy and Wright, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Section 7.8]
18. [M33] (J. Selfridge.) What is the highest power of 2 that divides the numerator of
?
We want to find the highest power of 2 that divides the numerator of
assuming
positive.
Let be the
integer such that
for some integer .
We know that
exists and is odd, as it is the product of the odd primes from the prime factorization of
.
We then have
which we may prove by induction on .
If ,
|
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
and hence the identity.
Let
|
be the common denominator such that
|
That is, such that the numerator of
is
|
sets of
terms, each of the
form over a distinct
odd residue of .
Each ratio itself is an integer and a distinct odd residue of
, and the sum of
distinct odd residues
is for some integer
by the odd number
theorem, odd. That
is, the numerator of
is
|
Since is odd, we know
the sum of odd terms
is itself an odd number.
Let this be , so that
the numerator of
is
for some odd integer .
That is,
is the highest power of 2 that divides the numerator of
where is the odd
integer such that
for some integer .
________________________________________________________________________________
[AMM 67 (1960), 924–925]
19. [M30] List all
nonnegative integers
for which is an
integer. [Hint: If
has odd numerator and even denominator, it cannot be an integer.]
The nonnegative integers
for which is
an integer are
and ,
since and
. To see why these
are the only , consider
the following. Let
with ,
so that
and ,
and let
be the common denominator for each term of
,
odd but
even. We
know that
exists and is odd, as it is the product of the odd primes from a prime factorization of the common
denominator. Then
If is an integer,
then so is .
But
|
for . Each term in
is even except for
the term with ,
, which means
is odd. But
the divisor
is even. This means their ratio cannot possibly be an integer, and hence the claim.
20. [HM22] There is an analytic way to approach summation problems such as the one leading to Theorem A in this section:
If , and this series
converges for ,
prove that
|
Proposition. If
and
converges for
then .
Proof. Let
be a series with arbitrary coefficients
such that
converges
for .
We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[AMM 69 (1962), 239; H. W. Gould, Mathematics Magazine 34 (1961), 317–321]
21. [M24] Evaluate .
The difference between the sum for
and
is given as
Then, in the case that
|
and assuming
|
it may be shown that
|
as
That is
|
22. [M28] Evaluate .
From summation by parts and exercise 21,
23. [HM20] By considering
the function , show how we can
get a natural generalization of
to noninteger values of .
You may use the fact that ,
anticipating the next exercise.
We can get a natural generalization of
to noninteger values of
by considering the function ,
using the fact that .
By definition,
and so
if and only if
giving us a natural generalization of
to noninteger values of
as
|
Note that in the case that
|
and assuming
|
we have that
proving the identity holds for all nonnegative integers
.
24. [HM21] Show that
|
(Consider the partial products of this infinite product.)
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary real. We must show that
|
But since
|
we have that
as we needed to show. □