Exercises from Section 1.2.6
Tord M. Johnson
May 7, 2015
1. [00] How many combinations of
things taken
at a time are possible?
There are
combinations of
things taken
at a time. Intuitively, each distinct set of
objects leaves out a single item, and there are
items.
2. [00] What is ?
We have
Intuitively, there is only a single way to choose nothing from nothing.
3. [00] How many bridge hands (13 cards out of a 52-card deck) are possible?
There are
possible bridge hands, as we are choosing 13 from 52 things.
4. [10] Give the answer to exercise 3 as a product of prime numbers.
The answer to exercise 3 was .
We can use Eq. 1.2.5-(8) to determine the prime factorization of each factorial and then the answer as a
whole as
5. [05] Use Pascal’s triangle
to explain the fact that .
By the binomial theorem,
That is, the digits represent the row in Pascal’s triangle for
,
.
6. [10] Pascal’s
triangle (Table 1) can be extended in all directions by use of the addition formula, Eq. (9). Find the three rows that go on top of
Table 1 (i.e., for ,
, and
).
Using Eq. (9)
|
we can extend Pascal’s triangle (Table 1) for
,
, and
as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3 | 1 | -3 | 6 | -10 | 15 | -21 | 28 | -36 | 45 | -55 |
-2 | 1 | -2 | 3 | -4 | 5 | -6 | 7 | -8 | 9 | -10 |
-1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
since ,
, and
.
7. [12] If is a fixed positive
integer, what value of
makes a
maximum?
Proposition.
for all integers ,
.
Proof. Let ,
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
First, we must show that the binomial coefficient is monotone in
,
.
That is, that
|
But
And by definition, since
for , we have in
general that if
or equivalently that if
In the case that ,
so that
|
That is for all integers
and
as we needed to show. □
8. [00] What property of Pascal’s triangle is reflected in the “symmetry condition,” Eq. (6)?
The property of Pascal’s triangle that is reflected in the “symmetry condition,” Eq. (6), is the
symmetry of the triangle itself. That is, each row, not counting zeros, is palindromic: values read
the same left to right and vice versa.
9. [01] What is the value of ?
(Consider all integers .)
Since
and
for ,
we have
|
10. [M25]
If is
prime, show that:
-
a)
- .
-
b)
- ,
for .
-
c)
- ,
for .
-
d)
- ,
for .
-
e)
- (É. Lucas, 1877.)
|
-
f)
- If the -ary number
system representations of
and
are
|
thenn
k ≡ ar
br … ⁡a1
b1 a0
b0 (modulo p).
The answers to exercise 10 follow below.
-
a)
- We may prove the equivalence.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that
and
prime. We must show that
|
But given (e) with ,
as we needed to show. □
-
b)
- We may prove the equivalence.
Proposition.
for .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that
is prime and .
We must show that
|
But given (e) with ,
and since ,
as we needed to show. □
-
c)
- We may prove the equivalence.
Proposition.
for .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that
is prime and .
We must show that
|
If ,
then clearly
|
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But by the addition formula and (b),
as we needed to show. □
-
d)
- We may prove the equivalence.
Proposition.
for .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that
is prime and .
We must show that
|
But by the addition formula Eq. (3) and (b),
as we needed to show. □
-
e)
- We may prove the equivalence.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let ,
, and
be arbitrary
integers such that
is prime. We must show that
|
Note that
Also note from Eq. (7), that
with
and
implies
|
and for arbitrary
that
|
Then, for arbitrary
by the binomial theorem,
or equivalently, by equating coefficients
|
as we needed to show. □
-
f)
- We may prove the equivalence.
Proposition. If
and ,
then .
Proof. Let ,
, and
be arbitrary
integers such that
and are the
-ary number
representations of
and
with
coefficients ,
,
respectively,
and .
We must show that
|
If ,
then
and ,
and clearly,
Then, assuming for an arbitrary integer
with
and
that
|
we must show that
|
for
and .
But given (e)
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
É. Lucas, American J. Math. 1 (1878), 229–230; L. E. Dickson, Quart. J. Math. 33 (1902), 383–384;
N. J. Fine, AMM 54 (1947), 589–592.
11. [M20] (E.
Kummer, 1852.) Let
be prime. Show that if
divides
but does not, then
is equal to the number of
carries that occur when
is added to
in the -ary
number system. [Hint: See exercise 1.2.5-12.]
Proposition. If
is prime and
but ,
then
is the number of carries that occur when
is added to
in the -ary
number system.
Proof. Let ,
,
,
and
be arbitrary nonnegative integers such that
is prime,
and
We must show that
is the number of carries that occur when
is added
to in
the -ary
number system. That is, given representations
,
, and
, that
is zero
for
and increases by one for every additional carry.
But
and for
from exercise 1.2.5-12,
Then,
To see show that
is the number of carries, we construct an inductive argument. As our basis, we consider
, so
that ,
,
, and
. In this case, we
have no carries, and
is given by
|
as expected. Then, assuming
is the number of carries for arbitrary
and
, we must
show that for
given a single
carry from digit
to as a result of
the addition of ,
establishing the relation
|
But
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Knuth and Wilf, Crelle 396 (1989), 212–219.
12. [M22] Are there any positive integers for
which all the nonzero entries in the th row of
Pascal’s triangle are odd? If so, find all such .
We want to find all positive integers
such that if ,
then . Let
be an arbitrary integer
such that , and, from
Eq. (3), so that .
We want to find
such that
|
But, by exercise 1.2.6-10(f), given the binary representations
and
,
if and only if each .
Since for each
and ,
, of the four cases,
we require ; or
equivalently, we require
unless ;
or
Hence, all the nonzero entries in the th
row of Pascal’s triangle—those for which
—are odd
if for some
integer .
(This can be generalized to nondivisibility by a prime
if
for
.)
13. [M13] Prove the summation formula, Eq. (10).
Proposition. .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
|
If ,
from Eq. (4),
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
14. [M21] Evaluate .
For an arbitrary integer ,
Summing over
and from Eq. (11),
15. [M15] Prove the binomial formula, Eq. (13).
Proposition. .
Proof. Let ,
, and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
|
If ,
then clearly
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
16. [M15] Given that
and are
positive integers, prove the symmetrical identity
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
and
be arbitrary positive integers. We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
17. [M18] Prove the Chu-Vandermonde formula (21) from Eq. (15), using the idea that
.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
and
be arbitrary positive integers. We must show that
|
from Eq. (15)
and from the identity
|
But
Equating coefficients yields
|
as we needed to show. □
18. [M15] Prove Eq. (22) using Eqs. (21) and (6).
Proposition. .
Proof. Let ,
,
, and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
19. [M18] Prove Eq. (23) by induction.
Proposition.
for integers ,
.
Proof. Let ,
, and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
|
If
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
20. [M20] Prove Eq. (24) by using Eqs. (21) and (19), then show that another use of Eq. (19) yields Eq.
(25).
We may prove Eq. (24) using Eqs. (19) and (21).
Proposition.
for nonnegative integers ,
,
and .
Proof. Let ,
,
,
and
be arbitrary integers such that
.
We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
We may also show that another use of Eq. (19) yields Eq. (25).
Proposition.
for nonnegative integers ,
,
,
and .
Proof. Let ,
,
,
and
be arbtirary nonnegative integers. We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
21. [M05] Both sides of Eq. (25)
are polynomials in ; why isn’t that
equation an identity in ?
According to the text on page 57, any polynomial
can be expressed as
for suitably chosen coefficients .
And so, the left hand of Eq. (25) can be expressed as
|
that is, a polynomial of degree at most
for suitably chosen coefficients ;
and the right hand of Eq. (25) can be expressed as
|
that is, a polynomial of degree at most
for suitably chosen coefficients .
Therefore, even though both sides of Eq. (25) are polynomials in
, since they do
not agree at all
possible points, the equation does not serve as an identity in
.
22. [M20] Prove Eq. (26) for the special case .
Proposition.
for integers .
Proof. Let ,
,
and
be arbtirary integers. We must show that
|
We consider two cases, depending on whether
or not.
Case 1. [] In
the case that ,
which gives us that
|
in this case.
Case 2. [] In
the case that ,
clearly
which gives us that
|
in this case.
Therefore, in either case, we have that
|
as we needed to show. □
23. [M13] Assuming that Eq. (26) holds for
and , prove it
for .
Proposition. If
and ,
then .
Proof. Let ,
,
,
and
be arbitrary integers such that
|
and
|
We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
24. [M15] Explain why the results of the previous two exercises combine to give a proof of Eq. (26).
The results of the previous two exercises combine to give a proof of Eq. (26) as a proof by induction
on .
In the case that ,
and in the case that ,
Otherwise, in the case that , we may
construct a proof by induction on
with .
If ,
Then, assuming
|
and
|
we must show that
|
But, by exercise 24
|
and hence the result.
25. [HM30] Let the polynomial
be defined as in Eq. (30). Let .
Prove that ,
provided is small
enough. [Note: If ,
this result is essentially the binomial theorm, and this equation is an important generalization of the
binomial theorem. The binomial theorem (15) may be assumed in the proof.] Hint: Start with the identity
|
Proposition.
for
sufficiently small.
Proof. Let be
the th degree
polynomial in
that satisfies
|
for ;
and
sufficiently small. We must show that
We may first prove that the sum converges by using the ratio test; that is, that
|
But if is sufficiently
small, , or
equivalently, ,
then
and hence the proof of convergence.
Then, given the identity
|
and letting
so that ,
we have that
or equivalently, that
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
H. W. Gould, AMM 63 (1956), 84–91.
26. [HM25] Using the assumptions of the previous exercise, prove that
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let be
the th degree
polynomial in
from exercise 25 that satisfies
|
for ; and
sufficiently
small so that .
We must show that
|
From exercise 25, we have that ,
or equivalently that
we have by definition that
or equivalently that
|
and we also have that ,
or equivalently that
Finally, diffirentiating the first equality yields
if and only if
as we needed to show. □
27. [HM21] Solve Example 4 in the text by using the result of exercise 25, and prove Eq. (26) from the preceding
two exercises. [Hint: See exercise 17.]
We may solve Example 4 from the text using the result of exercise 25.
Proposition.
for nonnegative integers .
Proof. Let be
the th degree
polynomial in
from exercise 25 that satisfies
|
for ; and
sufficiently
small so that .
We must show that
|
From exercise 25, we have that .
And so,
Equating coefficients yields
|
as we needed to show. □
We may also prove Eq. (26) from the preceding two exercises.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary integer. We must show that
|
From exercise 25, we have that
and from exercise
26, we have that .
Multiplying both equations yields
and again, from exercise 26,
|
which gives us the equality
|
Finally, equating coefficients yields
|
and hence the result. □
28. [M25] Prove that
|
if is a
nonnegative integer.
Proposition.
for
a nonnegative integer.
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that
|
If ,
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But from Eq. (26),
as we needed to show. □
29. [M20] Show that Eq. (34) is just a special case of the general identity proved in exercise 1.2.3-33.
Eq. (34) for
is
|
while the general identity proved in exercise 1.2.3-33 is
|
Thus,
and hence the result.
30.
[M24] Show that there is a better way to solve Example 3 than the way used in the text, by manipulating the sum
so that Eq. (26) applies.
We wish to evaluate the sum from Example 3
|
for positive integers
and ,
using Eq. (26)
|
But
and hence the result.
31.
[M20] Evaluate
|
in terms of ,
,
, and
, given
that
and are
integers. Begin by replacing
|
We have
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J. F. Plaff, Nova Acta Acad. Scient. Petr. 11 (1797), 38–57.
32. [M20] Show that ,
where is
the rising factorial power defined in Eq. 1.2.5-(19).
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be the rising factorial power defined as
We must show that
But
as we needed to show. □
33. [M20] (A. Vandermonde, 1772.) Show that the binomial formula is valid also when it involves factorial powers
instead of the ordinary powers. In order words, prove that
|
We may prove the formula for factorial falling.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that
|
If ,
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
We may also prove the formula for factorial rising.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer. We must show that
|
If ,
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
34. [M23] (Torelli’s sum.) In the light of the previous exercise, show that Abel’s generalization, Eq. (16), of the
binomial formula is true also for rising powers:
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and
an arbitrary nonzero real number. We must show that
|
Given the general identity for arbitrary
we have that
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A. Vandermonde, Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. (Paris, 1772), part 1, 492; C. Kramp, Élémens
d’Arithmétique Universelle (Cologne: 1808), 359; G. Torelli, Giornale di Mat. Battaglini 33 (1895),
179–182; H. A. Rothe, Formulæde Serierum Reversione (Leipzig: 1793), 18.
35. [M23] Prove the addition formulas (46) for Stirling numbers directly from the definitions, Eqs. (44) and
(45).
We may prove the addition formula for Stirling numbers of the first kind.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
and
be arbitrary nonnegative integers. We must show that
|
But from Eq. (44),
and hence the result equating coefficients. □
We may also prove the addition formula for Stirling numbers of the second kind.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
and
be arbitrary nonnegative integers. We must show that
|
But from Eq. (45),
and hence the result equating coefficients. □
36. [M10] What is the sum
of the numbers in each row of Pascal’s triangle? What is the sum of these numbers with alternating signs,
?
Assuming
a nonnegative integer, from Eq. (13),
and
37. [M10] From the answers to the preceding exercise, deduce the value of the sum of every other entry in a row,
.
Again assuming
a nonnegative integer, from the preceding exercise,
38. [HM30] (C. Ramus, 1834.) Generalizing the result of the preceding exercise, show that we have the following formula,
given that :
|
For example,
|
[Hint: Find the right combinations of these coefficients multiplied by
th roots of unity.] This identity is
particularly remarkable when .
Proposition. .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
|
Given
and the sum of the geometric progression for
restricted
such that ,
we have for the real part that
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
C. Ramus, Crelle 11 (1834), 353–355; CMath, exercises 5.75 and 6.57.
39. [M10] What is the sum
of the numbers in each row of Stirling’s first triangle? What is the sum of these numbers with alternating signs? (See
exercise 36.)
Assuming
a nonnegative integer, from exercise 32 we have that
and from Eq. (44) we have that
40. [HM17] The beta function is
defined for positive real numbers ,
by the formula
.
-
a)
- Show that .
-
b)
- Show that .
-
c)
- Show that .
Let
and
be arbitrary positive real numbers and define the beta function
as
|
-
a)
- We may show the first identity.
Proposition. .
Proof. We must show that
| (68) |
But by definition, both
and
and hence the result. □
-
b)
- We may show the second identity.
Proposition. .
Proof. We must show that
| (71) |
But
and hence the result. □
-
c)
- We may show the third identity.
Proposition. .
Proof. We must show that
| (73) |
But from integration by parts
|
which gives us that
Then, from (b)
and hence the result. □
41. [HM22] We proved a relation between the gamma function and the beta function in exercise 1.2.5-19, by showing
that , if
is a
positive integer.
-
a)
- Prove that
|
-
b)
- Show that
|
Define the gamma function for positive integers
as
|
so that from exercise 1.2.5-19
-
a)
- We may prove the first identity.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be a positive integer. We must show that
|
As an initial corollary, we will first show for positive integers
that
|
If
we have from exercise 40 (c) that
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But again from exercise 40 (c)
and hence the interim result. Then finally,
as we needed to show. □
-
b)
- We may show the second identity.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be a positive integer. We must show that
|
It is sufficient to show that
|
Note that B is monotonically decreasing for positive
and
. That
is, if ,
then ,
since from exercise 40
Then, since B is monotonically decreasing and from exercise 1.2.5-19,
And so from (a),
as we needed to show. □
42. [HM10] Express the binomial coefficient
in terms of the beta function defined above. (This gives us a way to extend the definition to all real values of
.)
From exercise 41 (b) we have
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
L. Ramshaw, Inf. Proc. Letters 6 (1977), 223–226.
43. [HM20] Show that . (From exercise
41 we may now conclude that .)
Proposition. .
Proof. Define the beta function
as
|
We must show that
But for ,
,
as we needed to show. □
44. [HM20] Using the generalized binomial coefficient suggested in exercise 42, show that
Proposition. .
Proof. As a corollary, we will prove Gauss’s multiplication formula. That is, that
|
By Stirling’s formula as ,
we have
and
and hence the result
|
For the proof, we must show that
But from exercise 42 and since ,
and
Multiplying both equalities yields
if and only if
|
That is, it is sufficient to show that
|
But, by Guass’s multiplication formula,
And so,
as we needed to show. □
45. [HM21] Using the generalized binomial coefficient suggested in exercise 42, find
.
From exercise 42 and Stirling’s approximation,
46. [M21] Using Stirling’s approximation, Eq. 1.2.5-(7), find an approximate value of
, assuming that
both and
are large. In particular,
find the approximate size of
when is
large.
Assuming that both
and
are large, using Stirling’s approximation, we find that
In particular, when
is large,
47. [M21] Given that
is an integer, show that
|
Give a simpler formula for the special case .
We may prove the equalities.
Proposition.
for integer .
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary integer. We must show that
|
In the case that ,
we have
and in the case that ,
we have
That is, in the case that
,
we have
In the case that ,
we have
It remains to consider the case when
.
Assuming
|
we must show that
|
As a corollary, note that from Eqs. (7) and (8) with
we have
Then
That is, for
an arbitrary integer
|
And finally, from Eq. (20)
as we needed to show. □
For the special case ,
we have the simpler equalities
if and only if, from Eq. (17)
That is, we have the simpler formula
48.
[M25] Show that
|
if the denominators are not zero. [Note that this formula gives us the reciprocal of a binomial coefficient, as well as the partial fraction
expansion of .]
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
and
be arbitrary, nonnegative integers. We must show that
|
First, note that
Then, if ,
Assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
49. [M20] Show that the identity
implies a relation on binomial coefficients.
Given
|
and the binomial theorem, we have that
which implies the relation
|
for integer .
50. [M20] Prove Abel’s formula, Eq. (16), in the special case
.
Proposition.
for integer ,
,
.
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and
,
,
arbitrary reals
such that ,
.
We must show that
|
or equivalently, since ,
that
|
But by the binomial theorem and Eq. (34)
as we needed to show. □
51. [M21] Prove Abel’s formula, Eq. (16), by writing
, expanding the right-hand
side in powers of ,
and applying the result of the previous exercise.
Proposition.
for integer ,
,
.
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and
,
,
arbitrary reals
such that ,
.
We must show that
|
or equivalently, since ,
that
|
But from Eq. (6), the binomial theorem, Eq. (20), and exercise 50
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A. Hurwitz, Acta Mathematica 26 (1902), 199–203.
52. [HM11] Prove that Abel’s binomial formula (16) is not always valid when
is not a nonnegative integer, by evaluating the right-hand side when
,
.
We may prove that Abel’s binomial formula
|
is not always valid when by
evaluating the particular case when ,
;
and
where is the Riemann
zeta function .
53. [M25] (a) Prove the following identity by induction on
, where
and
are
integers:
|
(b) Making use of important relations from exercise 47,
|
show that the following formula can be obtained as a special case of the identity in part (a):
|
(This result is considerably more general than Eq. (26) in the case
,
,
.)
-
a)
- We may prove the identity by induction.
Proposition.
for integers ,
.
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that
is nonnegative. We must show that
|
If
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
But from the inductive hypothesis as well as Eqs. (7) and (8)
as we needed to show. □
-
b)
- We may derive the formula as a special case of the identity in part (a).
Given the relations from exercise 47, since
and
we have that
Then, setting ,
in the result of (a) yields
so that, again with the relations from exercise 47, as well as Eqs. (7) and (8),
Hence
|
54. [M21] Consider Pascal’s triangle (as shown in Table 1) as a matrix. What is the inverse of that
matrix?
Let
|
represent Pascal’s triangle as a matrix. We want to find another matrix
such that
|
But by the definition of matrix multiplication
Hence, for arbitrary ,
|
and in particular for
as we wanted to find, so that the inverse matrix is given by
|
55. [M21] Considering each of Stirling’s triangles (Table 2) as matrices, determine their inverses.
Let
|
represent Stirling’s triangle of the first kind as a matrix. We want to find another matrix
such that
|
But by the definition of matrix multiplication
Hence, for arbitrary ,
|
and in particular for
as we wanted to find, so that the inverse matrix is given by
|
Similarly, let
|
represent Stirling’s triangle of the second kind as a matrix. We want to find another matrix
such that
|
But by the definition of matrix multiplication
Hence, for arbitrary ,
|
and in particular for
as we wanted to find, so that the inverse matrix is given by
|
56. [20] (The combinatorial number system.) For each integer
, find three
integers for
which
and .
Can you see how this pattern can be continued for higher values of
?
We may evaluate the largest values for ,
, and
that satisfy the
constraint such that .
| | | |
|
|
|
|
2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
4 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
4 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
4 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
4 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
5 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
5 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
5 | 3 | 0 | 13 |
5 | 3 | 1 | 14 |
5 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
5 | 4 | 0 | 16 |
5 | 4 | 1 | 17 |
5 | 4 | 2 | 18 |
5 | 4 | 3 | 19 |
6 | 1 | 0 | 20 |
|
This pattern can be continued for higher values of
by the following method:
let be the largest
integer that satisfies ;
the largest
that satisfies ;
and that
satisfies .
57. [M22] Show
that the coefficient
in Stirling’s attempt at generalizing the factorial function, Eq. 1.2.5-(12), is
|
Proposition.
in Stirling’s generalization of the factorial function.
Proof. Stirling’s generalization of the factorial function is
|
We must show that
|
But given
|
we have
And so
Therefore
|
as we needed to show. □
58. [M23] (H. A. Rothe, 1811.) In the notation of Eq. (40), prove the
“-nomial
theorem”:
|
Also find -nomial
generalizations of the fundamental identities (17) and (21).
In order to prove the “-nomial
theorem”, we define
|
and assume -nomial
symmetry
as well as the two -Pascal
identities
|
and
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
and
be an arbitrary nonnegative integer and real number, respectively. We must show that
|
If
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
Hence
|
as we needed to show. □
We may also find -nomial
generalizations of the fundamental identities (17) and (21).
For (17), we have
so that the -nomial
generalizations of the fundamental identity (17) is
|
For (21), the -nomial
theorem
|
gives us
Equating coefficients yields
|
if and only if
so that the -nomial
generalizations of the fundamental identity (21) is
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
H. A. Rothe, Systematisches Lehrbuch der Arithmetik (Leipzig: 1811), xxix; F. Schweins, Analysis
(Heidelberg: 1820), §151; D. E. Knuth, J. Combinatorial Theory A10 (1971), 178–180; G. Gasper and
M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990); C. F. Gauss,
Commentationes societatis regiæ scientiarum Gottingensis recentiores 1 (1808), 147–186; Cauchy,
Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 17 (Paris, 1843), 523–531; C. G. J. Jacobi, Crelle 32 (1846), 197–204;
E. Heine, Crelle 34 (1847), 285–328.
59. [M25] A sequence of numbers ,
,
, satisfies the
relations ,
,
for
. Find
.
We have that
|
and may prove this by induction.
Proposition. .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that ,
, and
.
We must show that
|
First note that
|
and
|
as required. If ,
we have
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
60. [M23] We have seen that is
the number of combinations of
things, at a time, namely the
number of ways to choose
different things out of a set of .
The combinations with repetitions are similar to ordinary combinations, except that we may
choose each object any number of times. Thus, the list (1) would be extended to include also
,
,
,
,
,
,
etc., if we were considering combinations with repetition. How many
-combinations
of
objects are there, if repetition is allowed?
The number of -combinations
of
objects, if repetition is allowed, is given by
The number of -combinations
of
objects, if repetition is not allowed is simply the number of integer solutions
such
that ,
known to be
|
If repetitions are allowed, we want to determine
and hence the result.
________________________________________________________________________________
H. F. Sherk, Crelle 3 (1828), 97; W. A. Förstemann, Crelle 13 (1835), 237.
61. [M25] Evaluate the sum
|
thereby obtaining a companion formula for Eq. (55).
We have
If
then
and
|
If
then
and
|
Otherwise, if
|
which we may prove by induction.
Proposition.
for .
Proof. Let
and
be arbitrary nonnegative integers such that
.
We must show that
|
If ,
and
Then, assuming
|
we must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
And so, since
we have that
|
62. [M23] The text gives formulas for sums involving a product of two binomial coefficients. Of the sums involving a
product of three binomial coefficients, the following one and the identity of exercise 31 seem to be most useful:
|
(The sum includes both positive and negative values of
.)
Prove this identity. [Hint: There is a very short proof, which begins by applying the result of exercise
31.]
Proposition. ,
integer .
Proof. Let
be arbitrary nonnegative integers. We must show that
|
But from exercise 31
|
we have for
that
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A. C. Dixon, Messenger of Math. 20 (1891), 79–80; A. C. Dixon, Proc. London Math. Soc. 35 (1903),
285–289; L. J. Rogers, Proc. London Math. Soc. 26 (1895), 15–32, §8; P. A. MacMahon, Quarterly
Journal of Pure and Applied Math. 33 (1902), 274–288; John Dougall, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Society 25
(1907), 114–132.
63. [M30] If ,
, and
are integers
and ,
prove that
|
Proposition. ,
integers ,
,
and .
Proof. Let ,
, and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
|
But as a polynomial in arbitary reals
and
,
we have
Continuing,
Equating coefficients yields the result
|
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CMath, exercises 5.83 and 5.106.
64. [M20] Show that
is the number of ways to
partition a set of elements into
nonempty disjoint subsets.
For example, the set can be
partitioned into two subsets in
ways: ;
;
;
;
;
;
. Hint:
Use Eq. (46).
Let denote the number of
ways to partition a set of
elements into
nonempty disjoint subsets for nonnegative integers
,
. If
,
then clearly
Otherwise, if ,
we seek the number of partitions which contain the set
, given by
and the number of
partitions in which
has been inserted into sets with other elements, given by
.
That is, from Eq. (46) and induction,
|
and hence the claim.
65. [HM35] (B. F. Logan.) Prove Eqs. (59) and (60).
We may prove Eq. (59).
Proposition.
for .
Proof. Let
be arbitrary complex numbers such that
.
We must show that
In the case that , by
definition and since ,
if and only if
From Eq. (6.51)
and given the definition of the
function as
|
we have that
which establishes the case .
Then, assuming
we must show that
|
But from the recurrence relations for falling factorial powers
|
and Eq. (46) we have that
as we needed to show. □
We may also prove Eq. (60).
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be arbitrary complex numbers. We must show that
|
By Euler-Maclaurin summation for Stirling’s
approximation
we have that
for an arbitrary positive integer
,
constant ,
“Stirling’s constant,” Bernoulli numbers
, and
,
so that
That is, so that
is a series in which each coefficient of
is a
polynomial in ;
and so similarly for the exponential
|
with coefficients ,
polynomials in , and with
asymptotic bounds ,
if and only if
|
From Eq. (44) for
restricted to the integers
|
and since is a
polynomial in
of degree
whenever
is a nonnegative integer, the coefficients of
hold for arbitrary
complex
such that
Therefore
and hence the result
|
□
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
AMM 99 (1992), 410–422.
66. [HM30] Suppose ,
, and
are real
numbers satisfying
where ,
,
, and
is an
integer .
Prove that
Proposition.
iff ,
iff .
Proof. Let ,
, and
be arbitrary real
numbers and an
arbitrary integer
such that
,
, and
.
We must show that both
|
and
|
We will first show the former. Since
,
and so .
Given the identities
and
for arbitrary integers ;
and letting ,
,
,
we have that
where
|
Similarly, since
increases by one as
decreases by one,
with the understanding that in the case
, we define
. Then,
for all ,
, since
by hypothesis
and ,
but
And so finally,
and hence the former result.
We will then show the latter, and it is sufficient to show that if
|
implies
|
then
|
But assuming
and since
by hypothesis, we have that
Also, with , and
given that for the
Euler-Mascheroni constant ,
and
Also, since
and since for arbitrary integers ,
,
we have that
Then
and hence the latter result. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
L. Lovász, Combinatorial Problems and Exercises (1993), Problem 13.31(a); R. M. Redheffer, AMM
103 (1996), 62–64.
67.
[M20] We often need to know that binomial coefficients aren’t too large. Prove the easy-to-remember upper bound
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let and
be arbitrary
integers such that .
We must show that
In the case that , if we
adopt the convention that ,
then
Otherwise, since clearly
and from exercise 1.2.5-24
|
we have that
Hence
for all integers
as we needed to show. □
68. [M25] (A. de Moivre.) Prove that, if
is a nonnegative integer,
|
Proposition. .
Proof. Let
be a nonnegative integer. We must show that
|
But
as we needed to show. □
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
De Moivre, Miscellanea Analytica (1730), 101; H. Poincaré, Calcul des Probabilités (1896), 56–60;
P. Diaconis and S. Zabell, Statistical Science 6 (1991), 284–302.